審判達爾文/审判达尔文 Darwin On Trial

內容簡介：

作者詹腓立Phillip E. Johnson為法律系教授，他以銳利的邏輯分析進化論的弱點，証明達爾文學說無法立足。
一一探究分析達爾文的進化論，提出疑點並舉出反證。幫助讀者如何分辨科學主義與自然主義，重新發現永存之神的榮耀。

作者: 詹 腓 力 Phillip Johnson
出版社: 中 信 / 244頁

In his own era, Darwin's most formidable opponents were fossil experts, not clergymen. Even today, according to the author, the fossil record, far from conclusive, does not support the presumed existence of intermediate links between species.
A law teacher at UC-Berkeley, Johnson deems unpersuasive the alleged proofs for Darwin's assertion that natural selection can produce new species. He also argues that recent molecular studies of DNA fail to confirm the existence of common ancestors for different species. Doubting the smooth line of transitional steps between apes and humans sketched by neo-Darwinists, he cites evidence for "rapid branching," i.e., mysterious leaps which presumably produced the human mind and spirit from animal materials. This evidence, to Johnson, suggests that "the putative hominid species" may not have contained our ancestors after all. This cogent, succinct inquiry cuts like a knife through neo-Darwinist assumptions.